The internet, as new media, is a hybrid of
collection, collation, connection and creation of visual and written
information. It offers a new forum for
the sharing and reproduction of meaning.
Institutional religion must move with the development of this media to
stay relevant in the meaning-making processes of contemporary society. This had
led to the rise of ‘religion online.’
Religion broadly debuted online in the form
of online chat rooms and bulletin boards, which provided a new means of
communication for people to express their religious interests and ethical
concerns. The growth of this as a medium of communication has instigated a
reassessment of how religious groups frame the idea of community, authority,
written media and texts. Increasingly, now, religious groups can collaborate
online, conducting spiritual rituals online and expressing their religious
interests. Far from blurring the boundaries of religious communities, my belief
is that this phenomenon has helped to solidify the borders of religious
identity under institutional religion and ‘new religion’.
Usenet, an online chat forum and bulletin board, which frequently features religious debate.
Source: Benjamin D. Esham. 25 May 2010. "Usenet traffic per day". WikiCommons.
The nature of the online community gives
unprecedented instantaneity to our lives. Information is available (and
expected) with a new sense of immediacy. Communication has effectively been
globalized, with the boundaries of local communities obliterated with access to
others across the globe at the click of the finger.
This has huge discursive implications in
the context of how religion is experienced and practice. First, it means that
discussion is not limited to local community and issues. The breadth and scope
of discourse is opened. Beliefs can be challenged, and more importantly, find
support, from all corners of the globe. Secondly, it means that people can
access religious ritual and discussion as they desire, day or night. The domain
of religion and spirituality is no longer limited by physical time and space.
It can occur in a private sphere, when required or desired. Thirdly, the way we
interact with the internet implicates the way we interact with religious
discourse and beliefs. Fundamentalist or literalist subscriptions to sacred
texts will naturally shy away from debate that challenges conventional meaning
and institutionalization of religion. Far from this meaning that the
fundamentalist discourse is excluded from the conversation, it finds support
through others who subscribe to that discourse. In the same way, those with
beliefs that might otherwise grate against the grain of institutional religion
find support in numbers online. Religion and spirituality can be reborn into
the popular discourse and taken exclusively out of the Church or mosque. Young
people in particular can engage with their spiritual concerns in a new way. The
inquisitive nature of debate means that beliefs are constantly reassessed. Far
from destabilizing religious or spiritual belief, however, this discourse
solidifies it. People find support as
much as they find challenge to their belief-sets, and those challenges seek
only to solidify the boundaries of religious or spiritual identity.
Source: WikiCommons.
I find the internet to be a primary source
of inspiration and ritualization of my spiritual experience. As a yoga teacher,
the yoga community online provides a rich and decadent source of information
and knowledge that is not otherwise available through the local community. The
diversity of contributors means that I can find my niche – and find support
with others. This has been incredibly powerful in establishing a form of
spiritual, and practical, identity as a teacher and as a philosopher.
Contrary to seeing the internet as a threat
to institutional religion, I see it as a re-empowerment of traditional
religious discourse. New media, in my mind, strengthens religious identity in
line with the social expectations and attitudes of contemporary society. The
internet is a case where we must other get on board or be left behind.
References
Campbell, H. 2010. Where Religion Meets New Media. New York: Routledge. Ebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment